Sélectionner une page

Be very careful if you plan to deliver your baby with an unlicensed doctor. Not only is their practice illegal, but there may also be important reasons why they have been denied a licence or why their licence has been revoked or suspended, such as criminal activity, misconduct or ongoing investigations. If you`re considering a planned home birth, you probably have questions. Is it safe? Do you need a midwife or doula? How do I create a backup plan? Find out what it is and what you should consider when deciding if your baby is right for you. (i) Prohibition of Practices. – Many states do not allow the practice of law through GPCs. CPMs can legally practice in thirty-four states and Washington, D.C., 109×109. Legal status of PMC by state, big boost for midwives, www.pushformidwives.org/cpms_legal_status_by_state [perma.cc/4493-FU8Q]. NJCs in all fifty states and MCs in just a handful.110×110.

Legal status of American midwives, all midwives. von N. Am., mana.org/about-midwives/legal-status-of-us-midwives [perma.cc/9J7M-7SUW]. Since most NCMs and CMs practice in hospitals, people who give birth in states that do not have a CPM license often have no legal option to give birth in hospital.111×111. Coll. of Nurse-Midwives, Fact Sheet: CNM/CM-Attended Birth Statistics in the United States (2016), www.midwife.org/acnm/files/ccLibraryFiles/Filename/000000005950/CNM-CM-AttendedBirths-2014-031416FINAL.pdf [perma.cc/4FFB-WLAH] (94.3% of births by NJCs/CMs occurred in hospital). Many people in these states will choose « community birth »112×112. More recently, the term « out-of-clinic » has been changed to « community birth » because « out-of-clinic » « objects hospital birth as normative and community birth as any other. » Melissa Cheyney et al., commentary, Community Versus Out-of-Hospital Birth: What`s In a Name? 64 J. Midwifery & Women`s Health 9, 9 (2019). In this chapter, the two terms are used interchangeably. In any case, there is a high demand for any underground midwife willing to serve them.113×113.

Some unlicensed states have fairly robust and open access to CPMs despite the lack of licenses, likely because government agencies have largely refused to prosecute them, while others have a hostile environment with limited access. Compare midwifery profiles, Mass. Midwives All., massmidwives.org/for-parents/members/#!directory [perma.cc/7ERA-5W6K] (advertising for CPM names despite lack of license), with Ill. Council of Certified Pro. Midwives, illinoismidwives.org [perma.cc/MW8J-6DCQ] (describes how CPMs « must practice underground » due to lack of approval). Midwives in these states are at risk of prosecution for helping people give birth.114×114. See Indra Lusero, Making the Midwife Impossible: How the Structure of Maternity Care Harms the Practice of Home Birth Midwifery, 35 Women`s Rts. L. Rep.

406, 417 (2014). Law enforcement can seemingly come out of nowhere after many years without government enforcement, ensuring that midwives and the people they serve in unlicensed states live with the ongoing risk of prosecution and a significant loss of access to health care.115×115. (describes the burden of practice or treatment under threat of prosecution). Midwives in accredited states may also face significant risks of prosecution for normal midwifery practice when overseen by hostile regulators, discouraging midwives` ability to fully support the decisions of women giving birth in those areas. See id., pp. 418–19. Here, too, we address each supplier individually. The hypothetical scenario is the injury or death of the mother or child during labour and delivery. We will primarily discuss the legal consequences of an adverse event during childbirth in Texas and the type of liability that exists for these providers. Differences in the types of medical crises or adverse events that different providers are trained to handle are discussed on the PROVIDERS page. Since the tort standard simply merges common practice, the primacy of the fetus promoted by tort law crystallizes into a legally enforceable standard of care.

This standard of care and the resulting care options for pregnant women include a blend of court values and the interests of medical providers. No. We only provide medical services related to your delivery, so you are responsible for arranging your own accommodation. If we process your property, it means that we are responsible for any damages or unpaid debts. Please visit our About page for the most popular accommodations among our guests. The complexity and irregularity of midwifery regulation in the United States reflects the considerable efforts made by medical associations to prohibit the practice of midwifery. Midwives accompanied the vast majority of births until the late nineteenth century, when a « doctor-led campaign to ban the practice of midwifery » began.101×101. Judith Pence Rooks, Midwifery and Childbirth in America 22 (1997); See ID under 17. Competition was a driving force for physicians, who saw childbirth as a pathway to high costs and new clients in the long run. See id., p. 19. Doctors publicly « attacked » midwives as « poor, black, immigrant, dirty, illiterate, untrained, ignorant, immoral, drunk.

and. criminal opponents of abortion. » Id. at the age of 25. These efforts were successful: in the first half of the twentieth century, obstetrics were almost eradicated and most births were transferred to hospital.102×102. See id., p. 31. Where the number of midwives has decreased, maternal and infant mortality has increased. Id., p. 30.

This has occurred despite broader trends of progressive reduction in maternal and infant mortality. See id., p. 31. Birth injuries caused by instrumental delivery by doctors and puerperal sepsis introduced into hospitals were likely determining factors. See id., pp. 25, 28–30. Obstetrics experienced a resurgence in the seventies and has since experienced waves of professionalization and fragmented government regulation.103×103. See id., pp. 60–64, 159–61, 225–28.

However, physicians have continued concerted campaigns to restrict midwifery and hamper efforts to improve access.104×104. In a 2007 report, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) praised « clever political maneuvering and harsh tactics. of the State Medical Association » to stop admission as a midwife. On the. Coll. of Obstetricians & Gyneclogists, ACOG State Legislative Update Year in Review (2007), collegeofmidwives.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/e-7-ACOG_Insider_Midwifery-Review_2007.pdf [perma.cc/YF5A-YAU6]. In 2014, ACOG published a « state legislative toolkit » allowing state chapters to oppose expanding access to midwives. See on. Coll. of Obstetricians & Gynecologists, State Legislative Toolkit: Licensure and Regulation of Certified Professional Midwives (CPM) (2014) (archived at Harvard Law School Library). Continued organized opposition from medical lobby groups has fueled today`s patchy and restrictive regulatory framework.

The ongoing prosecution of Elizabeth Catlin, a New York CPM, is an illustration of this. New York State allows CPG approval, but the law has been implemented to exclude them from licensing.116×116. Legal status of American midwives, see footnote 110. Catlin openly visited Mennonite women in rural New York for twenty-five years and was the only midwife in the area.117×117. Look at Tyler Pager, she helped give birth to hundreds of babies. Then she was arrested., N.Y. Times (5 March 2019), www.nytimes.com/2019/03/05/nyregion/mennonite-midwife-arrest.html [perma.cc/SC64-Y8YY]. In 2018, Catlin transferred a client to hospital for additional care.118×118. The baby was born in hospital and later died.119×119. Although a highly drug-based approach to childbirth is prevalent in the United States, its prevalence is not explained by superior outcomes.25×25.

More than 98% of births in the United States take place in hospitals. See Marian F. MacDorman and Eugene Declercq, Trends and State Variations in Out-of-Hospital Births in the United States, 2004–2017, 46 Birth 279, 280 (2019). About 9 per cent of hospital deliveries are attended by midwives. Amos Grünebaum et al., US Midwife-Attended Hospital Births are Increasing While Physician-Attended Hospital Births are Decline: 2003–2018, 223 Am. J. Obstetrics & Gynecology 460, 461 (2020). In hospital births, between 27% and 41% of contractions are induced, many without medical indication.26×26. See Rebecca Dekker, Evidence On: Inducting for Due Dates, Evidence Based Birth (Fév.